Efficient removal of formaldehyde using metal-biochar derived from acid mine drainage sludge and spent coffee waste.

A novel metal-biochar (Biochar/AMDS) composite were fabricated by co-pyrolysis of spent coffee waste (SCW)/acid mine drainage sludge (AMDS), and their effective application in adsorptive removal of air pollutants such as formaldehyde in indoor environments was evaluated. The physicochemical characteristics of Biochar/AMDS were analyzed using SEM/EDS, XRF, XRD, BET, and FTIR. The characterization results illustrated that Biochar/AMDS had the highly porous structure, carbonaceous layers, and heterogeneous Fe phases (hematite, metallic Fe, and magnetite). The fixed-bed column test showed that the removal of formaldehyde by Biochar/AMDS was 18.4-fold higher than that by metal-free biochar (i.e., SCW-derived biochar). Changing the ratio of AMDS from 1:6 to 1:1 significantly increased the adsorption capacity for formaldehyde from 1008 to 1811 mg/g. In addition, thermal treatment of used adsorbent at 100 °C effectively restored the adsorptive function exhausted during the column test. These results provide new insights into the fabrication of practical, low-cost and ecofriendly sorbent for formaldehyde.

Baseline Frailty Status Influences Recovery Patterns and Outcomes Following Alignment Correction of Cervical Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Frailty severity may be an important determinant for impaired recovery after cervical spine deformity (CD) corrective surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postop clinical recovery among CD patients between frailty states undergoing primary procedures. METHODS: Patients >18 yr old undergoing surgery for CD with health-related quality of life (HRQL) data at baseline, 3-mo, and 1-yr postoperative were identified. Patients were stratified by the modified CD frailty index scale from 0 to 1 (no frailty [NF] <0.3, mild/severe fraily [F] >0.3). Patients in NF and F groups were propensity score matched for TS-CL (T1 slope [TS] minus angle between the C2 inferior end plate and the C7 inferior end plate [CL]) to control for baseline deformity. Area under the curve was calculated for follow-up time intervals determining overall normalized, time-adjusted HRQL outcomes; Integrated Health State (IHS) was compared between NF and F groups. RESULTS: A total of 106 CD patients were included (61.7 yr, 66% F, 27.7 kg/m2)-by frailty group: 52.8% NF, 47.2% F. After propensity score matching for TS-CL (mean: 38.1°), 38 patients remained in each of the NF and F groups. IHS-adjusted HRQL outcomes from baseline to 1 yr showed a significant difference in Euro-Qol 5 Dimension scores (NF: 1.02, F: 1.07, P = .016). No significant differences were found in the IHS Neck Disability Index (NDI) and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association between frailty groups (P > .05). F patients had more postop major complications (31.3%) compared to the NF (8.9%), P = .004, though DJK occurrence and reoperation between the groups was not significant. CONCLUSION: While all groups exhibited improved postop disability and pain scores, frail patients experienced greater amount of improvement in overall health state compared to baseline disability. This signifies that with frailty severity, patients have more room for improvement postop compared to baseline quality of life.